<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Feature on yozy//NET</title>
    <link>https://yozy.net/categories/feature/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Feature on yozy//NET</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:13:29 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://yozy.net/categories/feature/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss" />
    <item>
      <title>WWDC 2019 Predictions</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2019/06/wwdc-2019-predictions/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:13:29 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2019/06/wwdc-2019-predictions/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This year&amp;rsquo;s Apple WWDC keynote will be allegedly focused on “Marzipan” and new iPad functionalities of iOS 13. Here are a few predictions that do not concern any of these.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will tease the new Mac Pro and it will contain at least one user accessible ARM CPU. This will be usable for tasks like machine learning and iOS development.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will not introduce a new MacBook Pro format. Otherwise they would Osbourne the latest crop of 15” MBPs.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;HomePod will get multiple user functionality through voice recognition. Siri can already train on various voices and it seems to be working okay.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;iOS 13 will be compatible with A9 and upwards. It might be even A10 but I doubt it. If it is A10, I would expect a feature that requires big.LITTLE CPU, like fewer restrictions for backgrounded apps.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As a side note, I hope Apple will not make the iTunes successor too simple. I wish it would retain support for iTunes Store, iTunes Match and local music, all of which are of great importance.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving iPhone and Pixel Photos</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2018/12/improving-iphone-and-pixel-photos/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2018 10:01:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2018/12/improving-iphone-and-pixel-photos/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5-bo8a4zU0&#34;&gt;MKBHD&amp;rsquo;s video about blind camera comparison&lt;/a&gt; concluded with a baffling result. The most interesting thing is not the winner, but the phones that got to share the last place: iPhone XS, iPhone X and Pixel 3.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Although their cameras are superior on technical level&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:1&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, people prefer pictures from other cameras because of increased brightness and saturation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Of course there is nothing that stops iPhone and Pixel to do the same thing at the cost of losing information rendering further post-processing inflexible. That being said, I can imagine that being beaten by a Blackberry in a photography test must hurt.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h1 id=&#34;solution&#34;&gt;Solution&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The solution is simple. I am sure that if pictures after auto-enhance have been thrown in the competition, the results would be different. The winner might stay the same, but I doubt that iPhones and Pixels would remain dead last.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What Apple and Google should do is to add an option to turn on auto-enhance by default. This way no information would be lost and people who prefer pictures without it could disable it. It would make the pictures coming straight off-camera punchier.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But first Apple would need to fix their auto-enhance algorithm which makes everything orange.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;footnotes&#34; role=&#34;doc-endnotes&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:1&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Noise, dynamic range and colour reproduction are comical on some of the tested phones.&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Holding the ARM Mac Release?</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2018/11/what-is-holding-the-arm-mac-release/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2018/11/what-is-holding-the-arm-mac-release/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The event held on the 30th of October solidified the idea roaming the Internet since a few years: ARM Macs are coming, and they are coming &lt;em&gt;soon&lt;/em&gt;. A-series chips have caught up to all but the best Intel mobile chips&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:1&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, so why is there an Intel processor inside the new &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I have a theory: A-series chips are not powerful enough–but in an unapparent way.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In my previous article I have predicted that Apple would:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rename the current &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Discontinue the &lt;em&gt;13″ MacBook Pro without TouchBar&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Introduce a new, cheaper, 13″ computer called &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This did not happen as predicted. What was announced is a new &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;, which is a 13&amp;quot; version of the current MacBook. Other laptops in the &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; line were untouched.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What I think will happen &lt;em&gt;next&lt;/em&gt; year is:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will introduce a new &lt;em&gt;12&amp;quot; MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt; and &amp;ldquo;discontinue&amp;rdquo;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:2&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:2&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; the &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; line.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will introduce a new &lt;em&gt;13&amp;quot; MacBook with Apple ARM chip&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:3&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:3&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But herein lies the problem. Which chip would go in? If Apple took the A12X processor from the current iPad Pro and added a bit of RAM, this setup would breathe at the neck of the current &lt;em&gt;15&amp;quot; MacBook Pro with Touchbar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:4&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:4&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;. This would have serious implications for the Pro line as the only differentiator would be the software they can use.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In order to offer compelling Pro hardware, Apple needs to make a beefier A-series chip. One that would give even the Intel desktop chips a run for their money.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;footnotes&#34; role=&#34;doc-endnotes&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:1&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href=&#34;https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/10611310?baseline=10581888&#34;&gt;A12X chip is neck-to-neck with a 6-core Intel Core i7-8850H&lt;/a&gt;; it only falls behind an i9&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In today&amp;rsquo;s Apple&amp;rsquo;s philosophy this means that it will continue to be sold, maybe with lower price.&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:2&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:3&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I expect this name to be something unexpected, what about an &amp;ldquo;Apple Mac&amp;rdquo;?&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:3&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:4&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If they added active cooling, I would bet that it could run circles around a 45watt 4-core Intel processor.&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:4&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple September 2018 Keynote Predictions</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2018/08/apple-september-2018-keynote-predictions/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2018/08/apple-september-2018-keynote-predictions/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As a fun exercise I would like to make some predictions for the 2018 September Apple keynote. There are two rumored machines that should come out.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-new-mac-mini&#34;&gt;The new Mac Mini&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to rumors, this machine will be geared towards pro users. As usual, the statement is vague. What pro users? Developers, animators, writers?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Current Mac Minis mainly serve three purposes:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;home media server&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;ldquo;rich man&amp;rsquo;s raspberry pi&amp;rdquo;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;server in a colo&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Professionals do not need home media servers, and since Apple does not make a standalone screen it means that the machine will have to be usable headless.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As such it will require Ethernet and power, which makes it possible to do away with all other ports. I expect Apple to offer a low-grade Xeon CPU option in order to allow for ECC ram and at least an option with 32G ram.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Why would Apple do this?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Nobody uses underpowered desktops today.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple needs and probably has a similar machine for internal usage.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The work on Xcode automation is useless if one cannot have an affordable Mac server.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-new-macbook-air&#34;&gt;The new MacBook Air&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I expect Apple to sanitize their offering. Nobody except Apple pundits knows how are the machines named before they enter the Apple store.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I believe that Apple will:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rename the current &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Discontinue the &lt;em&gt;13″ MacBook Pro without TouchBar&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Introduce a new cheaper 13″ computer called &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This will make the lightest Mac have the &lt;em&gt;Air&lt;/em&gt; moniker. The current &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; is underpowered for the generic user and the current &lt;em&gt;MacBook Pro without TouchBar&lt;/em&gt; is a compromised machine with no market.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;cpu-and-graphics&#34;&gt;CPU and Graphics&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For CPU it will have the cheapest Intel 15W CPU Apple can get, with expensive upgrades to CPUs with the same TDP. It will not have a discrete GPU and no TouchBar.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;ports&#34;&gt;Ports&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;People buying the Pro computer should be savvy enough to know which dongles to buy and people buying an ultra-light computer do not need peripherals.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;However, Apple needs the &lt;em&gt;Average Joe&amp;rsquo;s MacBook&lt;/em&gt; to work for most users today, not in an imaginary future. This means it needs at least one USB port. It does not need thunderbolt. It would be better with an HDMI port and an SD card slot but these are unlikely to be included.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I predict that it will have 2 USB-C ports for power and 1 or 2 USB-A ports (for symmetry).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;keyboard&#34;&gt;Keyboard&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If Apple wants to make this work they would need to backpedal to the old system. Even the new updated 2018 butterfly keyboard keeps failing. If they make a new body for this machine, it is possible that they would introduce a v4 of the butterfly switch mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My take on 3D Touch</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2018/08/my-take-on-3d-touch/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2018/08/my-take-on-3d-touch/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As the release of new iPhones is approaching, it is time to speculate on new features, or the removal of the old ones. There are rumors that one of the new iPhones will lack 3D Touch capability. To me, this is disturbing as I think that the biggest hindrance in 3D Touch adoption is that it is not omnipresent. Contrary to the opinion that &lt;a href=&#34;https://medium.com/@eliz_kilic/how-apple-can-fix-3d-touch-2f0ca5ea589e&#34;&gt;it is broken&lt;/a&gt;, I believe that discoverability is a minor issue.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;On a desktop interface there are no indicators to show that a particular element can be right-clicked. This is so because:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;There are few actions that are only doable by right clicking, mainly thanks to of toolbars and menu bars.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Users intuitively know which elements can be right-clicked.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;First point can be resolved by software: I leave it to designers to design a replacement for menus or toolbars that enable advanced functionality which can be then used with 3D Touch. The second point can be solved with users being exposed to 3D Touch all the time. With the current lineup this is a non-starter as it is available on high end phones only—not on the SE, and not on the iPad.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now is the time for Apple to show if they are invested in 3D Touch or whether it is just a &lt;em&gt;nice-to-have&lt;/em&gt; feature.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pondering the new iPhone lineup</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2015/08/pondering-the-new-iphone-lineup/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2015/08/pondering-the-new-iphone-lineup/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a theory. There have been quite a lot of rumours about a new &amp;ldquo;iPhone&#xA;6C&amp;rdquo; which ought to have the 6&amp;rsquo;s internals in a brand new 4&amp;quot; plastic body.&#xA;However, with no parts leaks this late into summer, the existence of this model&#xA;is not a given.  (side note: there are no leaks for the iPhone 6S plus out&#xA;either)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We know that Apple has already broken the pattern of older devices moving down&#xA;the price range with the 5C. I think this year the pattern could be broken&#xA;again.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;After the iPhone 5C was introduced, the Internet was swamped with articles&#xA;describing how much of a flop it was. The reality is that most people who buy&#xA;iPhones in October buy the latest and &lt;em&gt;beefiest&lt;/em&gt; one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So, what if Apple introduced the new, plastic, iPhone 6C in September but only&#xA;made it available in shops in December for the holidays? This would give them&#xA;approximately until October to ramp up the production, which would explain the&#xA;lack of the leaks.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Not only would they protect themselves. But they would also get an excuse for&#xA;the lower number of phones sold.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Edit 2015-09-14&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Well, first predition, first failure. My score so far: 0 out&#xA;of 1.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
