<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ARM on yozy//NET</title>
    <link>https://yozy.net/tags/arm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ARM on yozy//NET</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:30:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://yozy.net/tags/arm/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss" />
    <item>
      <title>What is Holding the ARM Mac Release?</title>
      <link>https://yozy.net/2018/11/what-is-holding-the-arm-mac-release/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yozy.net/2018/11/what-is-holding-the-arm-mac-release/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The event held on the 30th of October solidified the idea roaming the Internet since a few years: ARM Macs are coming, and they are coming &lt;em&gt;soon&lt;/em&gt;. A-series chips have caught up to all but the best Intel mobile chips&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:1&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, so why is there an Intel processor inside the new &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I have a theory: A-series chips are not powerful enough–but in an unapparent way.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In my previous article I have predicted that Apple would:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rename the current &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Discontinue the &lt;em&gt;13″ MacBook Pro without TouchBar&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Introduce a new, cheaper, 13″ computer called &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This did not happen as predicted. What was announced is a new &lt;em&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt;, which is a 13&amp;quot; version of the current MacBook. Other laptops in the &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; line were untouched.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What I think will happen &lt;em&gt;next&lt;/em&gt; year is:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will introduce a new &lt;em&gt;12&amp;quot; MacBook Air&lt;/em&gt; and &amp;ldquo;discontinue&amp;rdquo;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:2&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:2&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; the &lt;em&gt;MacBook&lt;/em&gt; line.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Apple will introduce a new &lt;em&gt;13&amp;quot; MacBook with Apple ARM chip&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:3&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:3&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But herein lies the problem. Which chip would go in? If Apple took the A12X processor from the current iPad Pro and added a bit of RAM, this setup would breathe at the neck of the current &lt;em&gt;15&amp;quot; MacBook Pro with Touchbar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:4&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:4&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;. This would have serious implications for the Pro line as the only differentiator would be the software they can use.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In order to offer compelling Pro hardware, Apple needs to make a beefier A-series chip. One that would give even the Intel desktop chips a run for their money.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;footnotes&#34; role=&#34;doc-endnotes&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:1&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href=&#34;https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/10611310?baseline=10581888&#34;&gt;A12X chip is neck-to-neck with a 6-core Intel Core i7-8850H&lt;/a&gt;; it only falls behind an i9&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In today&amp;rsquo;s Apple&amp;rsquo;s philosophy this means that it will continue to be sold, maybe with lower price.&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:2&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:3&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I expect this name to be something unexpected, what about an &amp;ldquo;Apple Mac&amp;rdquo;?&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:3&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li id=&#34;fn:4&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If they added active cooling, I would bet that it could run circles around a 45watt 4-core Intel processor.&amp;#160;&lt;a href=&#34;#fnref:4&#34; class=&#34;footnote-backref&#34; role=&#34;doc-backlink&#34;&gt;&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
